The blocs economic situation was dire even before the shocks of the Iran war, and yet it doubles down on supporting the US and Israel

Some observers of the current EU 'elites', including this author, used to believe that their defining feature - apart from things such as complicity in genocide and wars of aggression with Israel and the US, bigoted xenophobia about Russia and China, and, of course, pervasive corruption - was an absolute inability to learn.

We must admit, we stand corrected: Those running the EU are able to learn. The real problem is their relentless compulsion to learn the wrong thing. We are not dealing with non-learners but anti-learners: where others progress from experience, they regress.

Case in point, their response to the fact that their US-Israeli masters have started a war to end if not strictly all then at least all (barely) affordable energy supplies to the EU's economies, while its major players are already limping along on a spectrum between walking-wounded (for instance,France, maybe) to comatose (Germany, definitely).

In Germany, still the largest single economy inside the EU, providing almost a fourth of the bloc's total GDP, industrial demand - orders from factories - fellby over 11% in January. Such a decrease - really, collapse - in orders is"drastic," as German Manager Magazine notes. According to the Financial Times, this"very weak"start into the new year, puts preceding - and very modest - signs of a recovery from years of stagnation in doubt. Indeed. And all of that disappointing data was gatheredbefore the fallout of the Iran war had even started.

Regarding the latter, it will be severe. Even Berlin's Ministry of Economics admits that the risks stemming from the war's consequences, most of them still incoming, is substantial.

In general, the Eurozone - different from but covering most of the EU - is not in good shape either. According to Bloomberg, a very low and yet still over-optimistic Eurostat estimate of expansion by 0.3% for the last quarter of 2025has just been revised downward to 0.2%. But frankly, who cares at that level of misery?

And for the Eurozone as well, America and Israel's unprovoked war against Iran is likely to make things much worse. Philip Lane, chief economist of the European Central Bank (ECB), has confirmed that much to the Financial Times: An enduring decrease in oil and gas supplies from the Middle East can (read: will), he warns, bring about a"substantial spike" in inflation and a "sharp drop in output."

And what is the EU leadership's response to this deeply depressing outlook for its economy and the European citizens depending on it? Let's not dream. It is true, if the EU's 'elites' were in the business of protecting European interests and prosperity, they would, obviously, take a sharp turn against both the US and Israel (as well as London in case it were to stick to its special-poodle relationship with Washington).

Yet if the EU leadership had such priorities, it would long have turned against the US, for its blatant exploitation of its vassal regimes via, first, NATO over-expansion and, now, crippling overspending, for Ukraine proxy war outsourcing, and for devastating tariff warfare. It would also long have broken with Israel, for, to name only two compelling reasons, its genocide and serial wars of aggression that are both horrifically criminal and extremely destabilizing and damaging not "only" to the Middle East but the world as a whole and Europe in particular.

In short, the EU would not even be in the mess it is now if it actually took care of Europe. And, by the way, if it were not so craven but had opposed the US and Israel instead of pandering to them, perhaps it could even have contributed to preventing the current criminal war against Iran.

That, however, would not be the EU as it really is. In sordid reality, it is a second iteration of NATO, that is, an instrument of the US empire (notwithstanding showy and silly Greenland hysterics) and of international oligarchic structures. Ordinary Europeans matter only in so far as they are expected to vote - and think and speak - in line with EU 'elite' priorities,and when they do not, they are made to.

No wonder then that the utterly unelected andlegally extremely challengedEU Commission head Ursula von der Leyen - really, the EU's despot and US viceroy rolled into one - demonstratively does not give a damn about the massive energy price shock that has already started hitting the fragile economies of EU-Europe.

With tanker ships on fire off the Strait of Hormuz,oil surging over $100 per barrel, national reserves being dipped into, gas prices up by 50% in the EU, and, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), oil markets suffering"the largest supply disruption in history,"von der Leyen has had nothing tooffer but reverting to the tired - and less than successful - playbook of 2022, originally put together when the Western-Russian proxy war via Ukraine escalated. Tinkering, again, with ineffective price caps, taxes and fees, electricity market structures and price distortions, renewables, and wasting money on subsidies (out of budgets that are already vastly overstretched) - that was about it. No wonder, several national governments have alreadysignaled their impatiencewith what, in essence, is inactivity and non-strategy.

At least as important, though, was what von der Leyen took pains to rule out:Returning to Russian supplies would be a "strategic blunder,"the EU's one-woman decider-in-chief declared. Instead, she insists, the EU must stay the courseand continue ridding itself of the last remnants of Russian gas and oil. Clearly, von der Leyen is anxious that not everyone in the EU's 'elites' is up to her level of ideological obstinacy and economic as well as geopolitical irrationality. "Some," she chided, "argue that we should abandon our long-term strategy and even go back to Russian fossil fuels." Perish the thought! As long as von der Leyen and her type run the EU, it will ruin itself before doing the obvious - making peace with Russia and rebuilding economic ties, including in the energy sector.

And there you have it: This is a leadership style not simply refusing to learn from experience but repeating the worst blunders of the past. The von der Leyen way of policy making - from sanctions (now on round 20, I believe) to pipelines - is akin to negative natural selection: Whatever does not work will be done again, and again, and again. The real question, it seems, is not if the EU "elites" will ever stop being perverse anti-learners, but whether - or when - they will lose control. Mismanaging the massive shock that the US and Israel have sent their way now may finally provoke enough backlash from below to send the von der Leyens packing. For Europe's sake, let's hope for the best, even if it's delivered by the worst.

(RT.com)